On Apr 19, 2005, at 2:42 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
james tittle wrote:
On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
...I think this is a "why aren't we doing it already" kinda issue :-) The answer is that no-one has stepped forward and actually done it...I'm
the answer is simple: when i proposed it to hans at the pdcon04, he told me that this was non-sense: if the code development wasn't done at the pd-cvs, why should the code be there (or something alike this)
i still think that it is a good idea i still want to do the gem development on pd-gem instead of pure-data.
Since gem is going to remain in a separate CVS, this is a good workaround. I was trying to get all of the Pd source code into one repository so we can have complete dev builds automatically generated, tagged versioning across all the code, etc., etc. But its now obvious that the gem devs don't want this.
guessing that it isn't up to date with 0.90.1 atm?
i don't think so.
Currently there is no gem in the pure-data CVS AFAIK. I think that "externals/gem" would be a good location for all of the gem related files. So it would be like:
externals/gem/Gem externals/gem/GemLibs externals/gem/whatever else is needed
Then all of the gem stuff would be in one folder rather than scattered around the already crowded "externals".
.hc
________________________________________________________________________ ____
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. - Eldridge Cleaver