running 0.45-4 with both 0.45-4-compiled-Gem and 0.47-0-compiled-Gem gives:
tried /Users/user/Desktop/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin and succeeded
/Users/user/Desktop/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Users/(user)/Desktop/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin, 10): Symbol not found: *__ZN12FTBitmapFontC1EPKc*
Referenced from: /Users/user/Desktop/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin
Expected in: flat namespace
in /Users/user/Desktop/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin
/Users/user/Desktop/Gem: can't load library
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 4:02 AM, j-p k jptrkz@gmail.com wrote:
compiled against version & running version = 0.47 (keeping everything 32 bit)
output:
/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386
/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O executable ppc
pretty sure i got the same results with 0.45-4 but i'll try again tomorrow. 0.45-4 was working with git-Gem on another computer running osx10.6 at the point gemvertexbuffer hit the wall
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2016-05-03 09:40, j-p k wrote:
Gem.pd_darwin: Mach-O bundle i386
thanks.
"one" more question: i just noticed that you are compiling against Pd-0.47-0test2.
- do you use the same version to load Gem?
- whats the output of $ file /Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd
- can you try to load Gem with another version of Pd?
- can you try compiling Gem against another version of Pd?
fmgsd IO(asking dumb questions and hoping to get a hint)hannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev