Re: [GEM-dev] USB 3.0 camera and Gem

-- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr http://drii.ensad.fr -- Google lit ce mail... si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at] free.fr pour me contacter Le 1 avril 2012 15:42, Jack jack@rybn.org a écrit : > Le 01/04/2012 14:18, Antoine Villeret a écrit : > > hi jack, > > i'm using a firewire 400 over RJ45 extender (from AVT) on a tour with an > AVT Guppy > it's work fine with 50m cable, it should work at least until 100m but i > never tried > it's not possible to use switch to increase the distance with this kind of > extender > > you can use certain switches with GigE but it increases latency i think > > another solution for very long distance (more than 100m) is the optical > fiber > you can find some firewire over optical fiber extender > > Basler made a technical report on industrial cameras interface here : > http://www.i2s-vision.fr/upload/BAS1108_Interfaces.pdf > > hope this helps > > ++ > a. > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > http://drii.ensad.fr > -- > Google lit ce mail... > si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at] free.frpour me contacter > > > > Le 1 avril 2012 13:56, Jack jack@rybn.org a écrit : > >> Le 01/04/2012 02:22, Max a écrit : >> >>> Am 01.04.2012 um 01:53 schrieb Jack: >>> >>>> PS : does anybody tried an other solution (like GigE or >>>> USB<->Ethernet<->USB) with Gem when you need long distance between camera >>>> and computer ? Is it very stable ? >>>> >>> I could offer vnc access to a os x or ubuntu machine hooked up to either >>> a Allied Vision Tech GigE or Firewire 800 camera. >>> >>> m. >>> >> >> Hello Max, >> >> Did you ever tried that solution ? >> Is it appropriate to detect very small movement and is it enough fast to >> be used in real time (not to much latency ?) ? >> ++ >> >> Jack >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GEM-dev mailing list >> GEM-dev@iem.at >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev >> > > > Hello Antoine, > > Thanx to share your configuration and the Basler technical report, it is a > useful document. > What is the resolution the framerate you get on your computer from your > camera with that configuration ? > ++ > > Jack > > >