Perhaps I don't understand what you are trying to do, but why not use the GEM specific [separator] [pix_separator] objects?
Also, splitting a GEM chain without these objects will mean that each chain operates on the same set of data, so the pix_ data and GL states won't be unique to each.
On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
hi all ...
i've got a problem with a simple gem patch that's related to the way gem handles pixes ...
my patch looks like this:
pix_video | t a a | | | |do a | do b
but the |do a| part changes the state of the picture ... this for the dataflow: although i should have the same message to work on (coming from pix_video), i'm working on two different messages ...
for my taste, this doesn't follow the dataflow language of pd any more, since two messages that should have the same behaviour, behave different...
any idea, how to solve that?
cheers ... tim
-- mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager." William S. Burroughs
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.