24 Nov
2004
24 Nov
'04
5:20 p.m.
...now that IOhannes has committed something, I may as well start to discuss naming, too :-)
On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:09 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
to match the convension of gem
pdp_in and pdp_out would be best
(since we have sub-chains with prefixes in gem, pix_ vertex_ etc.. )
...I think this holds to the general design of gem, too; but...
[gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in] seem ok to me
or even
[out_pdp] and [in_pdp] to keep them shorter, since most gem objects don't have a gem_ prefix.
...I'm not sure that in and out are the best terms here? (although they aren't the worst, and make pretty good sense once ya see a patch)...
How about something more like [gem_to_pdp] & [gem_from_pdp]?
2 cents 2 late, jamie