Yeay releases! This is just in time for the 0.40.3-extended release, so maybe we can all work together to whip people into a testing frenzy.
I just tested some bug reports too...
.hc
On Apr 14, 2008, at 8:08 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
"Release early, release often”
0.90 was release many years ago, so yes, i think release is a good idea.
Cyrille
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
even though i have already mentioned it in my emails regarding the w32, i would like to ask you what you all think of doing a 0.91 release of Gem within the next weeks.
for me, the main reason to not release was, that there were no recent binaries for w32, and i have been unable to produce them for a while (i just gave up after 3 fruitless days several times). for whatever reasons i have been able to produce binaries, so we should use the opportunity:-)
so far, nobody has yet complained about the w32 binaries i posted, so they seem to run stable.
remaining issues are:
- OSX: marius' reports of flickering (could you be a bit more
specific as to what "flickering" means exactly?)
- linux: crashes on window-close with intel-based gfxcards
- linux: lqt backend of [pix_record] still crashes sometimes (i
really suspect that it is lqt not fullfilling what it promises in the API-documentation)
we probably could just release now (with these issues), and put out bugfix-releases once these issues are solved.
mgfa.sdr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
"[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from scarcity." -John Gilmore