Re: [GEM-dev] help with glsl abstractions

Le 02/09/13 12:55, Cyrille Henry a écrit :

yes, we can imaging extending this objects collection for vertex, or with function that is not yet possible with pix_ object. so having pix_ prefix on this objects is not a good idea imo.

What I had in mind is : [pix_*_sl] ONLY for glsl abstraction that replace a corresponding [pix_*] object and for example [vertex_*_sl for shader dealing with vertex. This way the abstractions are classed by fonctionnality instead of method (glsl).

But I get your point and it's surely easier your way. Nevertheless, one can ask is [glsl_alpha] a replacement for [alpha] or [pix_alpha]? Best, n

texture_alpha / texture_add / ... vertex_random / ...