On May 28, 2008, at 9:22 PM, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Jack jack@rybn.org:
Just for example, here is what i get when i open a simple image with Gem (without alpha) with a recent Pd-extended (20080524) and GEM: ver: 0.91.0 'tigital' on PowerBook G4 (PowerPC) and MacOSX.4.11.
both screenshots are taken with 0.91.0? it i think it works better with [pix_texture] :-)
All works fine with Pd-extended (20080315) and GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs. So i only use this Pd and Gem now on my PowerPC.
so we probably should use this version for the binary release. i forgot: how do i create a Gem.d_fat from a Gem.d_i386 and a Gem.d_ppc?
Add these to CFLAGS and LDFLAGS:
-arch ppc -arch ppc64 -arch i386
Remove "-arch ppc64" if you don't think a 64-bit build is safe.
.hc
I also send an email about a problem with [pix_mask] too.
that is why i started this whole thread...
fgmsad IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne