I'd like to do that, but I don't think I have time right now. I have to focus on just content right now.
.hc
On Mar 31, 2006, at 7:41 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
Although a lot of work I would say its better (if your going to start messing with Gem help patches at all) to convert them to the PDDP template... Of course there as still some issues with consistancy on platforms that need to be addressed first.
Anyhow my 2c
.b.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am working on the 5 part intro to Pd workshop outlined here:
http://puredata.org/dev/pddp/IntroWorkshopSeries
As I am doing that, I am going to be going thru the Gem docs a lot. A lot of the Gem help patches are quite nice, like cube- help.pd with the [pd gemwin] subpatch, and the clear format. I'd like to fix some of the others, like gemwin-help.pd, which are still quite raw.
Should I just send updated versions to y'all, or commit them directly (in which case I would need commit access)? A lot of the time, it'll be minor changes, like typos, small changes in working, etc.
Also, I was thinking that [pd gemwin] should be an object rather than a subpatch. Its handy for normal Gem use.
.hc
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. - Eldridge Cleaver
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits." - Martin Luther King, Jr.