Re: [GEM-dev] TextBase class

hi

of course [l2s] wouldn't make much sense with a limited length of symbols (at least with so low limits).

IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

i think that [print] is a bad debugging tool for extreme symbols.

it would be better to look at the symbol within C.

and doing so, i have done symbols with 20000 characters without problems.

of course this (like [l2s]) will polute the symbol-hash and (what is more important) will add a memory-leak (as symbols that once appear in a pd-sessions will stay there forever)

so a string-type would really be nice.

mfg.asd.r IOhannes

mfg.asd.r IOhannes

---

GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev