james tittle wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 2:56 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
...I understand, and it's true that a generalized solution would benefit pd more broadly...but it also introduces a new dependency, unless we put the editor object/abstraction into gem (or even pd or
well: while i think that gpu-programming in a nice editor is something cool, i think of it as a "cool" feature rather than a necessary one.
so i would have no problem, if we would have an external dependency (up till now, Gem knows nothing about the brutal tcl/tk-world. i would rather keep it like that) the only thing i would want to have, is that the editor should work and work an all platforms.
zexy) proper...I just think it's seductive to put a editor class in gem's program or text objects and inherit it, but that's just a narrow view and wouldn't help others that want text editing but don't care about gpu programming...
and i really would think it a folly if we would write a text-editor for pd (which is missing a usable one) and then restrict its use to something very specialist like gpu-programming.
...yeh, and like ben said, it's broken under 0.39+ apparently...I wonder if it's scrollable, too?
oh, i surely haven't tried it with 0.39. but/and i had no time to look for it (was busy doing threaded movie-loading...)
mfg.adr IOhannes