Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Sorry, I was trying to be funny and I guess I wasn't clear. There was a
blush.
10.3 machine in the build farm for a long while. Then Gem stopped building on 10.3, so I dropped the 10.3 machine. I don't know if current versions of Gem build on 10.3, but last I tried Gem definitely did not build on 10.3. And I posted on this list about it back then too.
right the archive show something in 2006-11. re-reading the archives, i see that it is not very clear on the final result: it might as well have worked after my fixes back then.
For the last Pd-extended release for 10.3, I actually manually included an older Gem build. So my guess is that Gem still does not build on 10.3, and if we are going to use the -mmacosx-version-min flag, it should be set appropriately.
again: mmacosx-version-min is about the target platform, not the compile platform. i guess one can use a recent compiler and recent features of this compiler and still run on a target machine that would not be able to compile the entire shebang. so the question is not whether it builds on 10.3 but whether it runs on 10.3
As for freetype, its included starting in 10.5 in /usr/X11/lib. That means if you want to build on 10.5 and have it be compatible with 10.4, you need to include an -isysroot flag to force the build to use the 10.4 SDK.
darn. but this means that the macosx-version-min doesn't help us here either.
fmgasd IOhannes