Am 26.03.2020 um 10:02 schrieb gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at:
Send GEM-dev mailing list submissions to gem-dev@lists.iem.at
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at
You can reach the person managing the list at gem-dev-owner@lists.iem.at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of GEM-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: GEM-dev Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1 (Michael Beil)
- GEM, OpenGL Depreciation and Metal on OSX (me.grimm)
- Re: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image (was Re: GEM-dev Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1) (IOhannes m zmölnig)
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:41:56 +0100 From: Michael Beil post@michaelbeil.de To: gem-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] GEM-dev Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1 Message-ID: E7073953-C7A9-40F2-B73C-AE773EF11CF5@michaelbeil.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
after more testing yesterday I can describe more precisely:
I send an image from pix_video to a rectangle and I use a gemwin with the same resolution. pix_video = 1280*720 gemwin = 1280*720 I use facetime (builtin), external webcam (logitech) and blackmagic intensity interface (USB3/HDMI) I get a proper image and I can switch the cams. THAT’S GREAT !!!! :)
but
- when I change the resolution of pix_video I have to recreate gemwin to see the effect
- when I send create, 1 to gemwin I get the bogus errors and I have to wait for them popping up (more for facetime, less for external cams)
- real issue: the border 0 message to gemwin creates a black gap where the border was and changes the image frame (part of the image at the left side vanishes by an x-zoom, the window-size remains the same)
- the rectangle object needs weird numbers like 7.5 and 4 to get the image fitting to a gemwin, the original image is very small in the gemwin without scaling and adapting
I found the help-file for pix_video in the Max folder. But when I open it in the patch it is blank.
best Michael
Am 25.03.2020 um 12:00 schrieb gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at:
Send GEM-dev mailing list submissions to gem-dev@lists.iem.at
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to gem-dev-request@lists.iem.at
You can reach the person managing the list at gem-dev-owner@lists.iem.at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of GEM-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
- GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image (Michael Beil)
- Re: GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image (IOhannes m zmölnig)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:22:41 +0100 From: Michael Beil post@michaelbeil.de To: gem-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: [GEM-dev] GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image Message-ID: 343AD94E-91B3-4693-87E3-A6E1F0B65872@michaelbeil.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi list,
I try to use a patch that worked with 0.43.4 with 0.5/Gem0.94 on a Mac. There are a some strange things I could not figure out yet. At first, each time I create a gem-window I get a dozen of
GEM: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image
errors.
Even when I just use the help-patch for pix_video (e.g.) I get them. All other problems are maybe also related to pix_video. Especially wrong resolutions and image-distortion. So my second question is: Has pix_video been replaced? Or discontinued? Is the pix_video-help still „valid“?
Maybe this has been discussed already, sorry then :)
Thanks and best Michael
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:01:36 +0100 From: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: gem-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] GEM/Mac: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image Message-ID: 6978e076-d568-7c68-6c22-1934301dc8b9@iem.at Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 3/24/20 2:22 PM, Michael Beil wrote:
Even when I just use the help-patch for pix_video (e.g.) I get them. All other problems are maybe also related to pix_video. Especially wrong resolutions and image-distortion. So my second question is: Has pix_video been replaced? Or discontinued? Is the pix_video-help still „valid“?
just a quick reply: [pix_video] is fine (well: should be :-)) the help-patch is also still valid.
what do you mean with "wrong resolutions" and "image distortion"?
which camera are you using?
gfmards IOhannes