Hey devs,
The basis of my post was how we can work together.
I think thinking beyond objects that pass data back and forth between the different systems.
To repeat my example, Gem, PDP and Gridflow all have tracking objects/abstractions. All created independantly, probably having no code in common either. I'm just saying it makes little sense to have three complete packages that can all do the same things. Even if they do it in different ways.
Better to work off the strength of one and other than reimplimenting similar ideas.
Thanks all for me.
B>
shree wrote:
I think that what Ben and I might be after is a synthesis of these three externals for a powerful image/video manipulation tool. I see a tremedous potential for these three to act together and time and development could be very advantageous.
So with this in mind i think for me it might be most helpful, and jamie may cringe but the bridge to and from pdp should flow both ways pdp2gem & gem2pdp and would be powerful beginning tools
and then the ability [IMHO] for all [pdp,gridFlow] to make use of the GEM window probably exclusively or selectively.
so in theory
[gemhead] | [pix_video] | [pdp_stauration] | [gf] stuff] | [rectangle]
could all be in a gemwin
How much of this is possible, or reasonable i will simply ask
Patrick Pagano, B.S., M.F.A. Research And Development Assistant Digital Worlds Institute University Of Florida (352) 294-2082
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list