Now, with Pd version 0.40.3-extended-20080601, [pix_image], [pix_film], [pix_alpah] work fine here. Thanx to have fixed this Iohannes. ++
Jack
Le 29 mai 08 à 14:17, Jack a écrit :
OK nice. Thanx Iohannes, I will test it tomorrow with autobuild of Pd- ext. ++
Jack
Le 29 mai 08 à 13:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
Jack wrote:
Le 28 mai 08 à 21:24, zmoelnig@iem.at a écrit :
Quoting Jack jack@rybn.org:
For info, [pix_film], [pix_movie], [pix_video] seem to work fine here with Pd-extended (20080524) and GEM: ver: 0.91.0 'tigital' on PowerBook G4 (PowerPC) and MacOSX.4.11 (using 5.reference/Gem).
so it is only [pix_image] that makes problems?
Yep, it seems. Here a capture with [pix_image] and [pix_texture].
does the alpha work too?
Yep, it work. With [pix_image], i get blue pixel (in my case, [pix_image] doesn't work). But with [pix_film], all is ok (normal too, because [pix_film] works fine for me). ++
i think i might have fixed it in the v0-91 branch now. at least i get consistent (and correct looking) behaviour on both G5 and i386)
either try out the new universal binary to be found at http:// gem.iem.at/releases/0.91.0/ or wait for the next pd-extended build (tomorrow)
fgmasdr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev