IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
even though i have already mentioned it in my emails regarding the w32, i would like to ask you what you all think of doing a 0.91 release of Gem within the next weeks.
for me, the main reason to not release was, that there were no recent binaries for w32, and i have been unable to produce them for a while (i just gave up after 3 fruitless days several times). for whatever reasons i have been able to produce binaries, so we should use the opportunity:-)
re-reading this email, i could hardly understand what i had written at all. i try to re-phrase:
### even though i have already mentioned it in my emails regarding the w32 binary of Gem, i would like to ask all of you what you think of finally doing a new release (0.91) of Gem within the next weeks.
the main reason for me to not release Gem for such a long time was, that there were no binaries available for w32. personally, i have been unable to produce w32-binaries for years (usually i tried for 3 fruitless days and then gave up; i did so several times) now finally, i have been able to build Gem on w32, and think we should use this opportunity. (just in case the window of luck closes again...) ###
i hope this makes more sense...
fgamsr IOhannes