zmoelnig@iem.at a écrit :
Quoting Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org:
for now, [any] is the only mandatory one. [list] should replace it, but for now it does not work.
Can't you just store it in a [list]? IIRC, the gem messages are just regular Pd messages.
Gem messages (ab)uses pointer-messages; unfortunately Pd does not handle pointers very well: neither [pack] nor [list] can handle pointers that are not data-structures.
i think the thing to do is to move away from pointers and use numbers/symbols instead (as ids to Gem-packages)
this is a lot's of work. is it?
maybe copying the [any] from iem to [gempointer] and included it in Gem source would be the fastest way to have everything to work (?)
(gempointer could be made as an abstraction later, when it will be possible to do it with [list]).
what do you think?
cyrille
mfga.dsr IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev