Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
PS: and i will revert the 00.VideoSimple.pd if the only 2 remaining messages are "enumerate" and "dialog" :-)
I'll test it on GNU/Linux and make sure it works. What's missing? If you want to use the original version as a test patch, it would make sense to label it that, like 05.TestVideo. I think that the first example patch, which is called "simple video" should be simple. It currently is not. I've watched many newbies get totally stumped by that patch as it is.
probably it is a misnomer then.
btw, why would you want the "enumerate" and "dialog" messages in the patch? a really simple patch would be like
[gemhead] | [pix_video] | [pix_texture] | [square]
period. what is wrong with that?
mfa.sdr IOhannes