IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
hi
cyrille henry wrote:
this is a lot's of work. is it?
don't know, i haven't started yet :-)
is it really on your todo-list?
what would be the benefit (other than using "float" better than "any")?
maybe copying the [any] from iem to [gempointer] and included it in Gem source would be the fastest way to have everything to work (?)
(gempointer could be made as an abstraction later, when it will be possible to do it with [list]).
what do you think?
this might be a good idea anyhow, as such an object could check whether the context is setup correctly and whether the state is valid. [any] should be prone to crashes if used incorrectly.
i never get a crash using any, but yes, that would be a good thing to do this check.
i don't like the name "gempointer" though, as it is inspired by the underlying implementation rather than the concept.
ok
probably [gemcache] or [gemstate] are better names...
gemstate is ok for me
cyrille
fam,rsd. IOhannes