and also what might prevent multiple funding sources?
Depending on how the money is being used maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing.
Using this Patreon as an example https://www.patreon.com/pippin the funding is to support the developer, not necessarily the GIMP software (even though the aforementioned person is a major developer of GIMP).
So, if we look at bountysource/this funding drive as a way to fund developers rather than the software (semantics, i know!) does that get over these potential issues?
On 25 November 2017 at 19:49, me.grimm megrimm@gmail.com wrote:
And if that's not it, what prevents anyone from sharing this campaign on facebook, the pd list and whatever?
and also what might prevent multiple funding sources?
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
2017-11-23 7:14 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry ch@chnry.net:
hello, I'm in discussion with joe deken from newblankets around an other/better way to deal with donation. So maybe we should wait a bit before making a wider announce of this bounty.
Hi, can you give us some more information about it? I don't understand what you mean.
Do you mean you will change the donation system from "bountysource.com"? I don't think so, cause, well, people already gave money to that... (me, for instance, gave 30$). But if that's the case, how do we deal with that (like, how to get the money back)?
And if that's not it, what prevents anyone from sharing this campaign on facebook, the pd list and whatever?
cheers
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
-- ____________________ m.e.grimm, m.f.a, ed.m. syracuse u., tc3 megrimm.net ____________________
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev