hi Miller,
the stable .38 still suffers random crashes due to the obvious bug. I think this one is too important to let it wait for .39.
Krzysztof
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PD-dev] fixing guiqueue Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:16:22 +0100 From: Krzysztof Czaja czaja@chopin.edu.pl To: pd-dev pd-dev@iem.at
hi Miller,
looks like this typo in sys_unqueuegui() was behind many, if not all, quiqueue-related crashes reported on pd-list:
--- s_inter.c~ 2004-10-25 05:10:19.000000000 +0200 +++ s_inter.c 2004-12-18 15:10:03.000000000 +0100 @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ if (gq2->gq_client == client) { gq->gq_next = gq2->gq_next; - t_freebytes(gq, sizeof(*gq)); + t_freebytes(gq2, sizeof(*gq)); break; } }
the stable .38 still suffers random crashes due to the obvious bug. I think this one is too important to let it wait for .39.
True! Just stumbled over the same one....
best greetings, Thomas
PS. Please don't forget to update the pthread headers' line-endings for Windows.....
Thanks... that's a major blooper. Fix to appear.
M
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:00:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
hi Miller,
the stable .38 still suffers random crashes due to the obvious bug. I think this one is too important to let it wait for .39.
Krzysztof
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PD-dev] fixing guiqueue Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:16:22 +0100 From: Krzysztof Czaja czaja@chopin.edu.pl To: pd-dev pd-dev@iem.at
hi Miller,
looks like this typo in sys_unqueuegui() was behind many, if not all, quiqueue-related crashes reported on pd-list:
--- s_inter.c~ 2004-10-25 05:10:19.000000000 +0200 +++ s_inter.c 2004-12-18 15:10:03.000000000 +0100 @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ if (gq2->gq_client == client) { gq->gq_next = gq2->gq_next;
t_freebytes(gq, sizeof(*gq));
}t_freebytes(gq2, sizeof(*gq)); break;
}