I just had a thought: now that Pduino 0.5 is nailed down and Pd-extended can load [arduino] from arduino/arduino.pd, I think its time to include Pduino in Pd-extended. Anyone have any ideas about why this would be bad? Or other related comments?
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:28 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I just had a thought: now that Pduino 0.5 is nailed down and Pd-extended can load [arduino] from arduino/arduino.pd, I think its time to include Pduino in Pd-extended. Anyone have any ideas about why this would be bad? Or other related comments?
I think it is a good idea. Personally, I would love to see it to be part of Pd-extended and I can't think of a reason not to include it.
Apart from that, I'm still finding it sad that we haven't managed to merge our two versions (NOTE: our [arduino] class is nor really different from yours). If there'd be a way to merge at least those changes that you could agree with, that would be already a huge goal. However, I haven't heard any profound criticism from you yet. If there is anything I can do to help achieve that goal, please let me know.
Roman
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Roman Haefeli