What does the inlet for the [noise~] object do? It's not mentioned in the help file...
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
Nothing... perhaps the object should be CLASS_NOINLET?
2017-11-30 18:12 GMT+01:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
What does the inlet for the [noise~] object do? It's not mentioned in the help file...
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Ok. Another small bug to fix then...
On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:18 PM, Pierre Guillot guillotpierre6@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing... perhaps the object should be CLASS_NOINLET?
2017-11-30 18:12 GMT+01:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>: What does the inlet for the [noise~] object do? It's not mentioned in the help file...
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
It could have a method for setting the seed for the pseudo-random number generator, which would be a useful addition if it isn't already there.
On 30/11/17 17:19, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Ok. Another small bug to fix then...
On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:18 PM, Pierre Guillot <guillotpierre6@gmail.com mailto:guillotpierre6@gmail.com> wrote:
Nothing... perhaps the object should be CLASS_NOINLET?
2017-11-30 18:12 GMT+01:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>:
What does the inlet for the [noise~] object do? It's not mentioned in the help file...
Claude
2017-11-30 16:01 GMT-02:00 Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk:
It could have a method for setting the seed for the pseudo-random number generator, which would be a useful addition if it isn't already there.
it isn't, and it could be used to set the seed indeed, nice call
In looking at d_osc.c, there is no float handler but I *suppose* it could be extended to modify/set the random seed for the noise~ instance. I imagine that hasn't been needed as yet, though. I'm in favor of removing the inlet.
On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:19 PM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. Another small bug to fix then...
On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:18 PM, Pierre Guillot <guillotpierre6@gmail.com mailto:guillotpierre6@gmail.com> wrote:
Nothing... perhaps the object should be CLASS_NOINLET?
2017-11-30 18:12 GMT+01:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>: What does the inlet for the [noise~] object do? It's not mentioned in the help file...
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
2017-12-01 7:51 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
I *suppose* it could be extended to modify/set the random seed for the noise~ instance. I imagine that hasn't been needed as yet, though.
Well, I'd like that feature. I think it'd be great for me to specify a particular seed that would always generate the same result I wanted, or to sync two noise objects. This is actually needed if you're using them with sample and hold to generate some random sequence.
So I'm in favor of adding this feature to it.
cheers
Here ya go: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/264 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/264
On Dec 2, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
2017-12-01 7:51 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>: I *suppose* it could be extended to modify/set the random seed for the noise~ instance. I imagine that hasn't been needed as yet, though.
Well, I'd like that feature. I think it'd be great for me to specify a particular seed that would always generate the same result I wanted, or to sync two noise objects. This is actually needed if you're using them with sample and hold to generate some random sequence.
So I'm in favor of adding this feature to it.
cheers
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
yay! thanks!
2017-12-04 10:36 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
Here ya go: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/264
On Dec 2, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com wrote:
2017-12-01 7:51 GMT-02:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
I *suppose* it could be extended to modify/set the random seed for the noise~ instance. I imagine that hasn't been needed as yet, though.
Well, I'd like that feature. I think it'd be great for me to specify a particular seed that would always generate the same result I wanted, or to sync two noise objects. This is actually needed if you're using them with sample and hold to generate some random sequence.
So I'm in favor of adding this feature to it.
cheers
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Claude Heiland-Allen -
Dan Wilcox -
Pierre Guillot