Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
! ## Something's wrong here: ! ##
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
...
! ## $(scripts_src)/generate-libdir-metafile.sh $(objectsdir) $ (RTC-LIB_NAME) \ ! ## --author "Karlheinz Essel and Frank Barknecht" \
Hi Frank, somethinge's definitely wronge here.
best greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
it's possible to switch off the digest mode for pd-cvs and forward the autobuild mails to the trash.
not a solution, just a hack ...
tim
-- tim@klingt.org ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
There's no such entity as "most people". These are generalities. All generalities are meaningless. You've got to pin it down to a specific person doing a specific thing at a specific time and space. William S. Burroughs
Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
it's possible to switch off the digest mode for pd-cvs and forward the autobuild mails to the trash.
ähm, if you choose to receive pd-cvs in non-digest mode, you should also be possible to select the "cvs" topic (and not no-topic (which is equivalent to ALL topics) or the "autobuild" topic). in this case you should not receive "autobuild" emails.
no, this is not possible in digest mode. tell me if it works (or not)
not a solution, just a hack ...
using topics is a hack too, but uses less bandwidth.
mfag IOhannes
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:24 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
it's possible to switch off the digest mode for pd-cvs and forward the autobuild mails to the trash.
ähm, if you choose to receive pd-cvs in non-digest mode, you should also be possible to select the "cvs" topic (and not no-topic (which is equivalent to ALL topics) or the "autobuild" topic). in this case you should not receive "autobuild" emails.
ah, cool ... thanks ...
tim
-- tim@klingt.org ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
Silence is only frightening to people who are compulsively verbalizing. William S. Burroughs
My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means more cooperation.
.hc
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
! ## Something's wrong here: ! ##
#--------------------------------------------------------------------
...
! ## $(scripts_src)/generate-libdir-metafile.sh $(objectsdir) $ (RTC-LIB_NAME) \ ! ## --author "Karlheinz Essel and Frank Barknecht" \
Hi Frank, somethinge's definitely wronge here.
best greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is publicity. - Bill Moyers
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means more cooperation.
Has the moratorium already ended? The other day you were asking about features from the "forks" to be included into Miller's PD and now you kindly tolerate the existence? I'm only asking for a constructive solution to make the digests more readable, as they used to be - i think the autobuild stuff is great, even though i don't use it. If my previous post sounded rough, maybe because i'm not a native speaker - it was completely unintentional.
all the best, Thomas
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means more cooperation.
Has the moratorium already ended? The other day you were asking about features from the "forks" to be included into Miller's PD and now you kindly tolerate the existence? I'm only asking for a constructive solution to make the digests more readable, as they used to be - i think the autobuild stuff is great, even though i don't use it. If my previous post sounded rough, maybe because i'm not a native speaker - it was completely unintentional.
Its the morning here, I just got up, so I was terse, sorry. See next email.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:42 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means more cooperation.
then i'm proposing to change the name from pd-cvs into pd.devel.desiredata-cvs_extended-autobuild@iem.at
;)
sorry ... just kidding ... tim
-- tim@klingt.org ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
All we composers really have to work with is time and sound - and sometimes I'm not even sure about sound. Morton Feldman
I reduced the autobuild report from 200 to 20 lines. That should help. I was hoping to have the autobuild reports not in the digest so that they are more apparent.
The idea is that if someone checks something in, the next day, they should check to make sure nothing broke. If something broke, then it should be fixed. Ideally we'd have buildbot setup. It can email the specific person who broke compilation. But that's a big project.
I have to say that I am very surprised that the autobuilds aren't being used by vibrez/devel, especially when working towards a release. It makes that job much, much easier.
.hc
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes.
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
! ## Something's wrong here: ! ##
#--------------------------------------------------------------------
...
! ## $(scripts_src)/generate-libdir-metafile.sh $(objectsdir) $ (RTC-LIB_NAME) \ ! ## --author "Karlheinz Essel and Frank Barknecht" \
Hi Frank, somethinge's definitely wronge here.
best greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
I reduced the autobuild report from 200 to 20 lines. That should help. I was hoping to have the autobuild reports not in the digest so that they are more apparent.
That sounds like a good solution.
I have to say that I am very surprised that the autobuilds aren't being used by vibrez/devel, especially when working towards a release. It makes that job much, much easier.
vibrez is a project that aims at good stability, hence it's too dangerous to compile directly from the cvs. Concerning pd-devel, it might be worth looking into it, although it's more urgent to merge in the changes from 0.40
best greetings, Thomas
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Thomas Grill -
Tim Blechmann