hi.
tg> Hallo Iohannes, tg> ich habe mich nicht selbst aus dem Verteiler ausgetragen... es ist mir tg> rätselhaft wie das geschehen konnte.
jdl> ick wars nyscht! ;) jdl> also habe mich nicht wissentlich von der cvsliste unsubscribed.
ksm> No, I want to be subscribed.
sorry abour all the buzz. it turned out that sourceforge changed the sender-addresses from <user>@users.sourceforge.net to <user>@projects.sourceforge.net
i have fixed this, so the new email-addresses will be accepted.
indeed, i noticed that none of you was able to unsubscribe the sourceforge-account (jdl: at least you have an email-address x57@projects.sourceforge.net, but i don't know, whether this is a real email account)
tg> Auf jeden Fall bin ich auch dafür, nur die logs zu schicken und nicht tg> die diffs...
jdl> ansonsten, diffs muss ich tatsaechlich nicht kriegen aber jdl> log-messages bzw. nur die namen der geaenderten files waeren top. jdl> wenn einen dann ein file interessiert muss man halt ins viewcvs jdl> gehen.
ksm> I want the diffs, please. :)
so since all persons (but kjetil ;-)) that has been asked directly don't want the diffs, probably i should check in the changes to avoid cvs-diffs at the mailing-list. (uh, again....i have asked this several times before. anyhow, if there aren't any serious objections between the next 4 days, i will submit my patch for the message generator to pure-data.sf.net)
mfg.as.dr IOhannes
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
(uh, again....i have asked this several times before. anyhow, if there aren't any serious objections between the next 4 days, i will submit my patch for the message generator to pure-data.sf.net)
hu, really ? no idea what this is about.
Guenter
guenter geiger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
(uh, again....i have asked this several times before. anyhow, if there aren't any serious objections between the next 4 days, i will submit my patch for the message generator to pure-data.sf.net)
hu, really ? no idea what this is about.
Guenter
sorry.
the problem is (as i see it, and probably several others): the mails sent to the pd-cvs list contain a) the names of the patched files b) the logs c) the diffs
i am only interested in a rough overview of the changes that happened (e.g: the log-files) i don't think anyone is reading the diffs (but probably i am wrong) if i was interested in the diffs, i would go to my local copy of the cvs and run "cvs diff".
now a quick and dirty hack would be to change the CVSROOT/loginfo script, so that the same version of a committed file is passed to "syncmail", resulting in a diff of 2 identical files (well: the diff of one single file), which is nothing. currently the diff of the current vs. the new file is calculated and sent.
i have set this up for the pd-gem CVS (is only sending mails to me right now), and it is working perfectly: i know when something has changed and i know what has changed. and most important: i read it ;-)
mfg.a.sdr IOhannes
i am only interested in a rough overview of the changes that happened (e.g: the log-files) i don't think anyone is reading the diffs (but probably i am wrong) if i was interested in the diffs, i would go to my local copy of the cvs and run "cvs diff".
i'm curious ... i'm interested in the diffs since i don't have a fast internet connection and so i can search my archive ... i never tried to use cvs diff, but concerning the man page, it needs a connection to the cvs server...
my 2.5 ¢
Tim mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 -- The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes "Awww!" Jack Kerouac
go ahead ..
[IOhannes m zmoelnig]->[Re: [PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs list]->[04-01-27 18:40]
|guenter geiger wrote: |> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: |> |>>(uh, again....i have asked this several times before. anyhow, if there |>>aren't any serious objections between the next 4 days, i will submit my |>>patch for the message generator to pure-data.sf.net) |> |> |> hu, really ? |> no idea what this is about. |> |> Guenter | |sorry. | |the problem is (as i see it, and probably several others): the mails |sent to the pd-cvs list contain |a) the names of the patched files |b) the logs |c) the diffs | |i am only interested in a rough overview of the changes that happened |(e.g: the log-files) |i don't think anyone is reading the diffs (but probably i am wrong) |if i was interested in the diffs, i would go to my local copy of the cvs |and run "cvs diff". | |now a quick and dirty hack would be to change the CVSROOT/loginfo |script, so that the same version of a committed file is passed to |"syncmail", resulting in a diff of 2 identical files (well: the diff of |one single file), which is nothing. currently the diff of the current |vs. the new file is calculated and sent. | |i have set this up for the pd-gem CVS (is only sending mails to me right |now), and it is working perfectly: i know when something has changed and |i know what has changed. and most important: i read it ;-)
-
d.lj -
guenter geiger -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Tim Blechmann