Hey Thomas,
When I built flext and did the #include <flext.h> I had to change one of the flext libraries - the one that included the relevant PD library said #include <m_pd.h>, but I had to change it to #include "m_pd.h" (couldn't find the PD library otherwise). Is this OK to do - will my object still work?
Thanks,
Matt
_________________________________________________________________ Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
When I built flext and did the #include <flext.h> I had to change one of
the
flext libraries - the one that included the relevant PD library said #include <m_pd.h>, but I had to change it to #include "m_pd.h" (couldn't find the PD library otherwise). Is this OK to do - will my object still work?
Yes, that's no problem. The difference between < > and " " is just the way how paths are defined.
Also, when I try to load in a flext based dll file (using
...\pd\bin\pd -lib
externalname.lib), after trying to create the object in the PD window the console keeps looking for the setup function in the code, which is of
course
not there. Am I missing something? Everything else seems to go OK...
In a flext based external, the setup function is defined implicitly. What does the error printout say?
best greetings, Thomas