hi,
me acting like a beta tester for the cvs of externals (linux): zexy is compiling fine, but doesn't start well:
/usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: undefined symbol: z_zexy_setup zexy: can't load library
it's fine when i do an old make. pat
patrick wrote:
hi,
me acting like a beta tester for the cvs of externals (linux): zexy is compiling fine, but doesn't start well:
/usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: undefined symbol: z_zexy_setup zexy: can't load library
i cannot reproduce this. however, it seems like you are compiling zexy without having z_zexy.c in zexy/src; run ./makesource and then compile
furthermore, you should try to load the library before you install it...
it's fine when i do an old make.
what do you mean by that? what is the "new" make you are using?
mfg.asdr. IOhannes
hi IOhannes!
what do you mean by that? what is the "new" make you are using?
sorry, for me doing scons in externals/build is the "new way" to compile lost of externals. but by doing so, zexy got compiled and install (scons install) but give me the error. so i have to externals/zexy/src / autoconf / make / make install. so maybe just removing zexy from the scons or fixing the scons for zexy? and this is not major anyway!
pat
patrick wrote:
hi,
me acting like a beta tester for the cvs of externals (linux): zexy is compiling fine, but doesn't start well:
/usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/zexy.pd_linux: undefined symbol: z_zexy_setup zexy: can't load library
i cannot reproduce this. however, it seems like you are compiling zexy without having z_zexy.c in zexy/src; run ./makesource and then compile
furthermore, you should try to load the library before you install it...
it's fine when i do an old make.
what do you mean by that? what is the "new" make you are using?
mfg.asdr. IOhannes
patrick wrote:
hi IOhannes!
what do you mean by that? what is the "new" make you are using?
sorry, for me doing scons in externals/build is the "new way" to compile lost of externals. but by doing so, zexy got compiled and install (scons
oh i see. i think assuming "scons" to be the more uptodate build system just because it is younger than scons is misleading. i only use make (with autoconf) to build things, therefore i only maintain make (with autoconf), and therefore this is the only build system that is guaranteed to work with zexy...
install) but give me the error. so i have to externals/zexy/src / autoconf / make / make install. so maybe just removing zexy from the scons or fixing the scons for zexy? and this is not major anyway!
of course fixing zexy's scons-file would be preferrable; anyone willing to do it?
mfg.asd.r IOhannes
pat
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i think assuming "scons" to be the more uptodate build system just because it is younger than scons is misleading.
oops, of course the 2nd "scons" should be replaced by "make".
i just wanted to say that: "autoconf+make" is older than "scons" (as programs), but this doesn't mean that scons would work any better, esp. if the build-scripts are not actively maintained.
mfa.,dsr. IOhannes
yes you are right. new for me then ;)
is there a way to:
cd externals/build make make install
and lots of externals will be install?
pat
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
patrick wrote:
hi IOhannes!
what do you mean by that? what is the "new" make you are using?
sorry, for me doing scons in externals/build is the "new way" to compile lost of externals. but by doing so, zexy got compiled and install (scons
oh i see. i think assuming "scons" to be the more uptodate build system just because it is younger than scons is misleading. i only use make (with autoconf) to build things, therefore i only maintain make (with autoconf), and therefore this is the only build system that is guaranteed to work with zexy...
install) but give me the error. so i have to externals/zexy/src / autoconf / make / make install. so maybe just removing zexy from the scons or fixing the scons for zexy? and this is not major anyway!
of course fixing zexy's scons-file would be preferrable; anyone willing to do it?
mfg.asd.r IOhannes
pat