Bugs item #1560895, was opened at 2006-09-18 19:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1560895...

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: [value] and [send]/[receive] share the same name

Initial Comment: [value] and [s] don't like if they are used with the same name.

e.g. the following will output "[value]: no method for bang"

[bang( | [s bla]

[value bla]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig)

Date: 2010-02-06 13:39

Message: and just to cover more cases:

it's perfectly allowed to use the same name for [catch~]/[throw~] and [send~]/[receive~].

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2010-02-06 13:37

Message: as reported by jonathan wilkes (#2946990 ), this also effects [catch~]/[throw~]

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2946990&gr...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mathieu Bouchard (matju) Date: 2006-09-21 19:06

Message: Logged In: YES user_id=801174

To me it's normal that [r] and [value] share the same symbol-table using exactly the same field (s_thing).

Why should it be different?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1560895...