Hey,
This is probably mostly for IOhannes. IIRC, the code that causes the "error: maximum object loading depth 1000 reached" stuff was related to the hexloader. Its checked into Pd-extended, but the hexloader isn't used in Pd-extended right now.
Is there some other reason to include this patch? Here's the original reference.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=1990599&group_id=5...
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"[T]he greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
This is probably mostly for IOhannes. IIRC, the code that causes the "error: maximum object loading depth 1000 reached" stuff was related to the hexloader. Its checked into Pd-extended, but the hexloader isn't used in Pd-extended right now.
Is there some other reason to include this patch? Here's the original reference.
well, it might be used for any sys_loader dealing with abstractions (or rather: objects that include other objects).
mfgf.drt IOhannes
On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:01 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey, This is probably mostly for IOhannes. IIRC, the code that causes the "error: maximum object loading depth 1000 reached" stuff was related to the hexloader. Its checked into Pd-extended, but the hexloader isn't used in Pd-extended right now. Is there some other reason to include this patch? Here's the original reference.
well, it might be used for any sys_loader dealing with abstractions (or rather: objects that include other objects).
mfgf.drt IOhannes
That does sound useful indeed. Are there any plans for such a loader in the near future? I think we should try to keep Pd-extended as close to Pd-vanilla as possible, so I am thinking that we should remove patches that aren't being directly used, but then we can add them back in once they are being used.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:01 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey, This is probably mostly for IOhannes. IIRC, the code that causes the "error: maximum object loading depth 1000 reached" stuff was related to the hexloader. Its checked into Pd-extended, but the hexloader isn't used in Pd-extended right now. Is there some other reason to include this patch? Here's the original reference.
well, it might be used for any sys_loader dealing with abstractions (or rather: objects that include other objects).
mfgf.drt IOhannes
That does sound useful indeed. Are there any plans for such a loader in the near future? I think we should try to keep Pd- extended as close to Pd-vanilla as possible, so I am thinking that we should remove patches that aren't being directly used, but then we can add them back in once they are being used.
IOhannes,
Mind if I remove this patch for this release? I think that the 1000 line "already loaded" dump is currently too common, for whatever reason, and since this functionality isn't currently in use, as far as I know, I think it makes sense to keep this patch out until the whole abstraction loader thing is figured out.
I am fine with adding it back in whenever its needed.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IOhannes,
Mind if I remove this patch for this release? I think that the 1000 line "already loaded" dump is currently too common, for whatever reason, and since this functionality isn't currently in use, as far as I know, I think it makes sense to keep this patch out until the whole abstraction loader thing is figured out.
yes of course, no problem.
fgmasdr IOhannes
I am fine with adding it back in whenever its needed.
.hc
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:20 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IOhannes, Mind if I remove this patch for this release? I think that the 1000 line "already loaded" dump is currently too common, for whatever reason, and since this functionality isn't currently in use, as far as I know, I think it makes sense to keep this patch out until the whole abstraction loader thing is figured out.
yes of course, no problem.
Done. http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data?view=rev&revision=...
.hc
fgmasdr IOhannes
I am fine with adding it back in whenever its needed. .hc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.