Bugs item #1736701, was opened at 2007-06-13 21:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fbar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1736701...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pd-extended Group: v0.39.2
Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Assigned to: Frank Barknecht (fbar) Summary: [list-len] uses [list length], which doesn't exist in 0.39
Initial Comment:
In Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2, list-abs/list-len uses [list length], which does not exist in 0.39 at all. It was introduced in 0.40. Therefore, list-len does not work.
(it would be good to look for other 0.40isms that were included in the backport of the list-abs to 0.39.2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Frank Barknecht (fbar)
Date: 2007-06-16 11:55
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=569446 Originator: NO
Thanks for testing, stffn.
Then it's fixed in pd-ext RC3 on all platforms, as it's just about abstractions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: stffn (stffn) Date: 2007-06-16 11:36
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1658640 Originator: NO
Both list-len and list-compare work here in RC3.
(os x.4.9, macbook core duo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Frank Barknecht (fbar) Date: 2007-06-13 22:58
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=569446 Originator: NO
Additional note: I found out, that last week I forgot to check in a similar fix for another patch that was using [list length]: list-compare.pd The 0.39 version is checked in now.
Should I close this bug or would you prefer to keep it open until pd-ext rc3/final?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Frank Barknecht (fbar) Date: 2007-06-13 22:34
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=569446 Originator: NO
Actually I have fixed this in the branch "branch-v0-39-2-extended" five days ago by reverting to a previous version, so it should be okay automatically fixed for the next pd-extended release.
Sorry for introducing this bug in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1736701...
-
SourceForge.net