Hi to all,
I've been using pd on OS X but I now need to use it with Linux on a Via Epia 5000 board. So I have two questions: - has anyone ever used pd with such a motherboard? - what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
Thanks, Julien
--- Julien Jassaud sojastar@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hi to all,
I've been using pd on OS X but I now need to use it with Linux on a Via Epia 5000 board. So I have two questions:
- has anyone ever used pd with such a motherboard?
- what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
I can't help you on the motherboard, but I would highly recommend Redhat Linux with PlanetCCRMA packages (low-latency/preemptive kernel, etc), including PD and libs:
http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/planetccrma.html
A close second, IMHO, would be Mandrake, and I'm sure others would mention Debian, esecially Agnula (http://www.agnula.org/).
Kevin
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
I've got a VIA C3 board (not sure about the model number) which was my main machine for a while. They're wonderful, not too fast, but very low power and reliable. Main thing I advise is to stay away from Gnome and KDE which are real CPU soakers. I use Fvwm which is wonderful, and twm is also great but takes a bit more work to learn to use. As long as your window manager and related garbage isn't eating 90% of your CPU you can rock and roll all day on a VIA CPU, and be a low polluter as well.
cheers Miller
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 07:56:27PM -0700, kevin ernste wrote:
--- Julien Jassaud sojastar@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hi to all,
I've been using pd on OS X but I now need to use it with Linux on a Via Epia 5000 board. So I have two questions:
- has anyone ever used pd with such a motherboard?
- what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
I can't help you on the motherboard, but I would highly recommend Redhat Linux with PlanetCCRMA packages (low-latency/preemptive kernel, etc), including PD and libs:
http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/planetccrma.html
A close second, IMHO, would be Mandrake, and I'm sure others would mention Debian, esecially Agnula (http://www.agnula.org/).
Kevin
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:15:37PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
and reliable. Main thing I advise is to stay away from Gnome and KDE which are real CPU soakers.
As far as window managers go if you want a light one which looks really good as well you should try out fluxbox or one of the other blackbox derivatives. There are tons of great themes on themes.freshmeat.net(.) If you're running debian, installing it is as simple as "apt-get install fluxbox".
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 383 chrism -1 -20 2332 1948 1776 S < 0.0 1.5 0:00 fluxbox
[disclaimer; i am a total fluxbox fanatic]
Chris. _________________________________ chris@mccormick.cx http://www.mccormick.cx http://www.hypercube.com.au http://www.sciencegirlrecords.com
hi all,
please, dont confuse window-managers with desktop-enviroments.
kde is (and gnome as well) a complete enviroment, with apps, helpers, tools...
you can happily use any other window manager in kde, like icewm, fvwm, .....
also, you can disable all that funky bells and whistles in kde, thus making it pretty plain while still giving the great flexibility of a desktop.
memory shouldnt be a real concern nowdays, ask your local dealer for the price of, lets say, 256 mbyte.
for the "cpu-hog": it hogs as much cpu as many bells-and-whistles you have enabled. and, as with any app using dynamic librarys, if you load a single kde app in a non-kde enviroment, it takes pretty "long" the first time. but if you were inside kde, where most of the libs are already loaded, it will go really fast.
i for myself will never give up the ease-of-use of a real desktop like (and especially) kde.
greets,
chris
Anyone have any information about making the Hammerfall Digiface card work in PD under OSX?
-Zack
Chris,
Agreed, but you must admit that running just a window-manager is lighter than running a full desktop-environment, no matter how much you strip them back. Obviously the more processes running on your system, the more CPU time that must be shared. Also, I find the startup times of a freshly installed Gnome or KDE desktop simply intolerable, but that is a matter of personal preference I suppose.
Chris.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Christian Klippel wrote:
hi all,
please, dont confuse window-managers with desktop-enviroments.
kde is (and gnome as well) a complete enviroment, with apps, helpers, tools...
you can happily use any other window manager in kde, like icewm, fvwm, .....
also, you can disable all that funky bells and whistles in kde, thus making it pretty plain while still giving the great flexibility of a desktop.
memory shouldnt be a real concern nowdays, ask your local dealer for the price of, lets say, 256 mbyte.
for the "cpu-hog": it hogs as much cpu as many bells-and-whistles you have enabled. and, as with any app using dynamic librarys, if you load a single kde app in a non-kde enviroment, it takes pretty "long" the first time. but if you were inside kde, where most of the libs are already loaded, it will go really fast.
i for myself will never give up the ease-of-use of a real desktop like (and especially) kde.
greets,
chris
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
- what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
i'm using pd with suse which works fine, but i'm interested in switching to gentoo. it should get the best performance out of your system by compiling all programs optimized for your machine!
is anyone working with pd under gentoo? is it difficult to keep the kernel patches (i'm using the ck-patches) up to date when updating the whole system? is it possible / easy to downgrade some packages (such as alsa) without problems?
thanks for advises... tim
TimBlechmann@gmx.net wrote:
- what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
i'm using pd with suse which works fine, but i'm interested in switching to gentoo. it should get the best performance out of your system by compiling all programs optimized for your machine!
which seems to be more a rumour than proven fact. see
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&fi...
for a comparison of debian, gentoo and mandrake.
debian or redhat/planet ccrma has more audio packages than gentoo has. recompiling of rpm or deb packages is not very difficult, if you want to optimize the binary for you CPU.
tim,
i've use quite a few linux distros and while they all seem to have their quirks, I've settled on gentoo.
debian was fine, but I really wasted a lot of time configuring. redhat will work. suse is probably the worst of all selections. I also played round with some minimal linux's like crux.
in the end, I'm sticking with gentoo. config is simple but can take a while to understand the system. when installing though, be prepared to let you computer sit for a day or two. it really takes a while to compile gcc, xfree and mozilla. not sure if it really speeds up the machine, but it really feels faster (at least psychologically).
for pd though, you probably will run into problems with alsa and jack and pd. expect to download these apps yourself and install in /usr/local. and the pd dist is stuck at 0.35 I think at the moment.
I've always had a symstem, even with debian and redhat, that was a mixture of 'core' distrobution programs and then self-compiled apps (normally alsa, mplayer and the media things) in /usr/local. with gentoo, i seem to be doing the same.
maybe that helps -august.
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:51:11 +0200 smoerk smoerk@gmx.de wrote:
TimBlechmann@gmx.net wrote:
- what is the best Linux distribution to use pd with?
i'm using pd with suse which works fine, but i'm interested in switching to gentoo. it should get the best performance out of your system by compiling all programs optimized for your machine!
which seems to be more a rumour than proven fact. see
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&fi...
they used a celeron machine without any further optimizations beside "-march=pentium3 -pipe -O3" to compare the systems. they didn't use any sse/sse2/mmx optimizations...
i suppose (i can't prove it) you should get a bit more performance on these machine that they did for the test... they used the most stable settings...
Tim mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.nyds-exp-discogs.tk -- The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes "Awww!" Jack Kerouac