Hi, Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
i just uploaded a bug-fix release of flext along with a collection of tutorial examples exposing some basic flext functionality.
And I made some test packages for Debian out of flext-0.3.1, available at http://footils.org/debian/
Some notes to this packages: * They are *not* lintian clean, although all lintian errors were removed... * They are build with g++-3.0, because: g++-2.95.4 did build, but trying to load the tutorials resulted in an immediate segfault of PD here. * They install everything to /usr/lib/pd/flext, but there are also these files: flext_d.a flext_td.a What are those? Should they be removed?
ciao
Hi Frank,
And I made some test packages for Debian out of flext-0.3.1, available at http://footils.org/debian/
That's really great!!! In the meantime i've become a debianist as well.
- They are build with g++-3.0, because: g++-2.95.4 did build, but trying to load the tutorials resulted in an immediate segfault of PD here.
That's strange as i'm using it as well. Can that be a compiler version mismatch between your PD, glibc and flext versions?
- They install everything to /usr/lib/pd/flext, but there are also these files: flext_d.a flext_td.a What are those? Should they be removed?
Those are the precompiled flext libraries (with gcc 2.95.4), for all those too lazy to compile - or for those who don't want to mix compiler versions.
greetings, Thomas
Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
- They install everything to /usr/lib/pd/flext, but there are also these files: flext_d.a flext_td.a
Sorry... those are the debug builds (with debug info and without optimization) flext_d.a -> thread-unaware flext_td.a -> thread-enabled
Ah. I was just wondering, why my debianized version was two files and some KB bigger than yours including source and binaries. I'll leave them in for now...
ciao