Oops, I didn't reply to all initially...
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com To: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:44 PM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports
----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-dev@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-20 15:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Jonathan,
I'm guessing that you're the one filing all the bug reports
about
help patches. I'm wondering what your goal is with filing them. It seems that you're also committing stuff to the same help patches?
of course i cannot speak for jonathan, but it seems like the help-patch edits remove the "TODO" found in [pd META] - as these
TODOs
are now tracked in the bugreport tickets: "moved doc errors from META subpatch to svn tracker"
actually i think having these tickets in the sf-tracker is a good idea.
You are correct. Most of the commits were simply as stated. Some of the META comments didn't apply anymore so I removed those without adding to the tracker. Everything added to the tracker should be current help patch bugs which may be:
- missing example patch
- missing description of the object
- failing to explain what an xlet does
- broken connections
- some or all of the above
Doing this makes the search results with the gui-plugin "prettier" and centralizes all bugs to the tracker.
-Jonathan
fgamsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlDTM+cACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTiRgCdFONctusJ6hGKnWh0dEHWDhWb pKAAoPE8UoAu7DKlQ8nXVOyiD9kIlR6V =t7BP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-dev@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] help patch bug reports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-20 15:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Jonathan,
I'm guessing that you're the one filing all the bug reports
about
help patches. I'm wondering what your goal is with filing them. It seems that you're also committing stuff to the same help patches?
of course i cannot speak for jonathan, but it seems like the help-patch edits remove the "TODO" found in [pd META] - as these
TODOs
are now tracked in the bugreport tickets: "moved doc errors from META subpatch to svn tracker"
actually i think having these tickets in the sf-tracker is a good idea.
You are correct. Most of the commits were simply as stated. Some of the META comments didn't apply anymore so I removed those without adding to the tracker. Everything added to the tracker should be current help patch bugs which may be:
- missing example patch
- missing description of the object
- failing to explain what an xlet does
- broken connections
- some or all of the above
Doing this makes the search results with the gui-plugin "prettier" and centralizes all bugs to the tracker.
-Jonathan
That makes sense, just wondering what the idea was.
.hc
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Jonathan Wilkes