No. They are the same.
Some objects simply have (always had) an offset based on the outline thickness and/or the label. It should be apparent when looking in the code.
The work I did was to fix zooming, import the object sizing from Pd-extended, and fix any bugs I found. I did not change the existing behavior or sizing of the IEM guis (hopefully).
On Dec 7, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
With libPd, calling the getrect function of the IEM's GUIs gives coordinates that seem to be slightly different from what is really drawn. I've seen in the Github PR 227 ( https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/227 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/227), that the IEM's GUIs have been updated. Do the size and the position of the objects has changed?
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
Alright, thanks a lot!
2017-12-07 14:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
No. They are the same.
Some objects simply have (always had) an offset based on the outline thickness and/or the label. It should be apparent when looking in the code.
The work I did was to fix zooming, import the object sizing from Pd-extended, and fix any bugs I found. I did not change the existing behavior or sizing of the IEM guis (hopefully).
On Dec 7, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
With libPd, calling the getrect function of the IEM's GUIs gives coordinates that seem to be slightly different from what is really drawn. I've seen in the Github PR 227 ( https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/227), that the IEM's GUIs have been updated. Do the size and the position of the objects has changed?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
-
Dan Wilcox -
Pierre Guillot