Hi all, is there any accepted standard how cvs version tags should look like? In my local cvs i use "v0_4_0" for version 0.4.0. My cvs contributions are now "beta", which means they should be usable which some caution.
best greetings, Thomas
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, is there any accepted standard how cvs version tags should look like? In my local cvs i use "v0_4_0" for version 0.4.0. My cvs contributions are now "beta", which means they should be usable which some caution.
Thats great, about the naming, if we really want to have a standard, Iwould prefer it more verbose, like version_0_4_0. But that probably just because I am used to it.
Guenter
best greetings, Thomas
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
Am Mittwoch, 27.11.02, um 20:50 Uhr (Europe/Vienna) schrieb guenter geiger:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all, is there any accepted standard how cvs version tags should look like? In my local cvs i use "v0_4_0" for version 0.4.0. My cvs contributions are now "beta", which means they should be usable which some caution.
Thats great, about the naming, if we really want to have a standard, Iwould prefer it more verbose, like version_0_4_0.
Ok, i see that the pd versions are tagged like that... it seems logical to me to simply adopt that.....
best greetings, Thomas
-
guenter geiger -
Thomas Grill