Bugs item #2970978, was opened at 2010-03-16 01:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2970978...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pd-extended Group: None
Status: Pending Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Summary: print lists format error
Initial Comment: Hi, if you print any lists, they come out in several lines, as if each space got replaced by 2 returns. An example from the print help file:
"print: walk
the
dog " Comes out, instead of "print: walk the dog"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2010-03-16 11:53
Message: which version are you referring to?
at least it should be fixed in the pd-gui branch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2970978...
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, SourceForge.net noreply@sourceforge.netwrote:
Bugs item #2970978, was opened at 2010-03-16 01:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2970978...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pd-extended Group: None
Status: Pending Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Summary: print lists format error
Initial Comment: Hi, if you print any lists, they come out in several lines, as if each space got replaced by 2 returns. An example from the print help file:
"print: walk
the
dog " Comes out, instead of "print: walk the dog"
Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2010-03-16 11:53
Message: which version are you referring to?
at least it should be fixed in the pd-gui branch
Excuse me for asking (and not trying as i cannot now) Does this mean that double newlines have been eliminated OR that lists are printed on one line? I suggested the latter some time ago http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2879474&gro...
Thanks, Andras
Excuse me for asking (and not trying as i cannot now) Does this mean that double newlines have been eliminated OR that lists are printed on one line? I suggested the latter some time ago http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2879474&gro...
afaik, before 0.43 lists were printed in one line. the current behaviour is certainly a bug: if you print the output of a symbol atom, you'll get "print: symbol
asdfd
"
Also, if you print a message box with [list 1 2 3 4 5(, you don't get the "list" class, just the numbers. (divided into several lines, of course)
I've read your sugestion for the printing of lists. I myself think that it makes much more sense to print lists in one line. An option to divide into several lines can always be made with [drip]. Or, by adding some parameter to the print object. I would myself also like to print something without the name of the print object.
João
On 2010-03-16 23:37, João Pais wrote:
Excuse me for asking (and not trying as i cannot now) Does this mean that double newlines have been eliminated OR that lists are printed on one line? I suggested the latter some time ago http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2879474&gro...
afaik, before 0.43 lists were printed in one line. the current behaviour is certainly a bug: if you print the output of a symbol atom, you'll get
what do you refer to as "current"? last nights HEAD of /trunk/pd (aka "the not yet released nor working 0.43"), which is rev.12655? or last nights HEAD of /branches/pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 (rev.13214) (aka "the sandbox where the gui-things are implemented and hopefully transferred to /trunk/pd later")? or some release? or some binary snapshot of which you don't know the actual version?
i can only say that "it works for me" in /branches/pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 (as of now).
whether this is what andras requests or not i cannot tell, but to me it looks consistent and nice (mainly the code, but also the "look").
fgasdr IOhannes
afaik, before 0.43 lists were printed in one line. the current behaviour is certainly a bug: if you print the output of a symbol atom, you'll get
what do you refer to as "current"? last nights HEAD of /trunk/pd (aka "the not yet released nor working 0.43"), which is rev.12655? or last nights HEAD of /branches/pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 (rev.13214) (aka "the sandbox where the gui-things are implemented and hopefully transferred to /trunk/pd later")? or some release? or some binary snapshot of which you don't know the actual version?
aha. it was Pd-0.43.0-devel-windowsxp-i386.exe, from maybe 2 days ago.
i can only say that "it works for me" in /branches/pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 (as of now).
whether this is what andras requests or not i cannot tell, but to me it looks consistent and nice (mainly the code, but also the "look").
you got me lost there, I was going on only about how elements print in the console.
But yes, it looks nice. Btw, any prognostic to when it will be finished? Or it's better to quote a portuguese football player, "prognostics only after the game"?
João
On 2010-03-17 11:23, João Pais wrote:>
aha. it was Pd-0.43.0-devel-windowsxp-i386.exe, from maybe 2 days ago.
well, i posted the update to the tracker immediately after i committed the change (yesterday). i see now, that this was unclear from what i had actually written. sorry for the confusion.
whether this is what andras requests or not i cannot tell, but to me it looks consistent and nice (mainly the code, but also the "look").
you got me lost there, I was going on only about how elements print in the console.
i was only referring to the console and to andras' mail which you replied to. nevermind.
fgm,asdr IOhannes