Patches item #3497084, was opened at 2012-03-05 09:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mathieubouchard You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3497084...

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata-dev Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: fix for open_via_path() declaration headfizz

Initial Comment: m_pd.h says that the parameters for open_via_path() are: "open_via_path(name, ext, dir, ...)"

otoh, s_path.c implements the function as "open_via_path(dir, name, ext,...)" also the function is used as (dir, name, ext,...) throughout the code.

the attached cosmetic patch fixes the function declaration in m_pd.h, so i don't get headfizz whenever i try to find out why i'm using the function correctly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mathieu BOUCHARD (mathieubouchard) Date: 2012-03-06 07:34

Message: Just imagine that the ministry of transportation puts the wrong signs on the autobahn. When it's time to fix them, they call the change «cosmetic». So, of course, they ask a beautician to take care of it.

Do any changes to the docs also count as «cosmetic» ?

Because help-intro.pd always listed classes that never existed, such as [powtorms~] and [rmstopow~]. I suppose that it's cosmetic too ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3497084...