-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2010 12:00 PM, pd-cvs-request@iem.at wrote:
Message: 4 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:02:41 +0000 From: eighthave@users.sourceforge.net Subject: [PD-cvs] SF.net SVN: pure-data:[13794] trunk To: pd-cvs@iem.at Message-ID: E1OkNsH-0008IV-8E@sfp-svn-1.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Revision: 13794 http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/pure-data/?rev=13794&view=rev Author: eighthave Date: 2010-08-14 21:02:39 +0000 (Sat, 14 Aug 2010)
Log Message:
applied Felipe Sateler's feedback on the pd-motex package to these packages
Modified Paths:
trunk/abstractions/footils/list-abs/debian/changelog
hi hans, so do you plan to maintain debian/ files in both the pure-data svn and the pkg-multimedia repositories?
what's the good use of that?
fgmasdr IOhannes
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:02 +0200, "IOhannes m zmölnig" zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2010 12:00 PM, pd-cvs-request@iem.at wrote:
Message: 4 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:02:41 +0000 From: eighthave@users.sourceforge.net Subject: [PD-cvs] SF.net SVN: pure-data:[13794] trunk To: pd-cvs@iem.at Message-ID: E1OkNsH-0008IV-8E@sfp-svn-1.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Revision: 13794 http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/pure-data/?rev=13794&view=rev Author: eighthave Date: 2010-08-14 21:02:39 +0000 (Sat, 14 Aug 2010)
Log Message:
applied Felipe Sateler's feedback on the pd-motex package to these packages
Modified Paths:
trunk/abstractions/footils/list-abs/debian/changeloghi hans, so do you plan to maintain debian/ files in both the pure-data svn and the pkg-multimedia repositories?
what's the good use of that?
I like to make more confusing, annoying work for everyone so I'm going to keep the files in pure-data SVN and Debian git ;-P
If you look a little closer, you'll see that "motex" has been submitted to Debian pkg-multimedia, and it no longer has a debian/ folder in pure-data SVN.
.hc
fgmasdr IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxoK6sACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQdvwCePEtCVNS4sJ7i4/+FMOk0M2Sm w1QAmwU6gv0RxVeveVQn7NhkIEKoGQWt =JJUn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2010 08:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If you look a little closer, you'll see that "motex" has been submitted to Debian pkg-multimedia, and it no longer has a debian/ folder in pure-data SVN.
i see (i haven't looked that closely) but since i guess you want to package all those libraries with pkg-multimedia as well, i'm still wondering whether it helps the confusion :-)
far IOhannes
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 20:41 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2010 08:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If you look a little closer, you'll see that "motex" has been submitted to Debian pkg-multimedia, and it no longer has a debian/ folder in pure-data SVN.
i see (i haven't looked that closely) but since i guess you want to package all those libraries with pkg-multimedia as well, i'm still wondering whether it helps the confusion :-)
My plan is to work the pd-motex package all the way thru pkg-multimedia, apply what I learn in that process to all of the packages in pure-data SVN, then submit those via pkg-multimedia.
Then as I upload them to pkg-multimedia git, I'll remove the debian/ folders from pure-data SVN. I figure I'll keep committing in pure-data SVN until then since that's where the development started.
.hc
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmölnig