to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
cheers
Miller
On 5/6/24 09:36, Miller Puckette wrote:
to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
of course I missed one PR that (hopefully) finally fixes the out-of-screen windows on windows. i've re-opened the `develop` PR for this: - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2285
also, as indicated in the issue tracker before, one of the now-accepted PRs (improvements/i18n) introduced a new string to be translated. a side-effect of this is that building Pd (with gettext installed) now changes the translation files in po/ (adding the new translatable).
it would be nice if we can get the updated translations into the final release (i find it always annoying, if building (a released version of) Pd changes some files :-))
hopefully a few non-english find the time to visit https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/pure-data/pure-data/ and finish up their native tongue in time.
i've re-opened the `l10n` PR for this: - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2286
gfmdasfrt IOhannes
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 04:37, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
Hi, been focusing on docs and manual changes and no objections for that as there'll be time for more revisions on the list.
I don't have any easy/quick request for the test release but I do clearly have a great deal of hopes and expectations for several PRs over there.
And I honestly don't see that many changes yet for the test releases to start popping up and I wonder if you can be clear on some of the things from the lots of other things to do yet.
I'll take the opportunity to reinforce that I hope we can focus on more multichannel features and list PRs again.
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2110 add secondary signal inlets to clip~ - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2059 Add functions to draw multichannel connections - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2058 allow to change the number of tables/channels in table DSP objects - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2052 multichannel support for readsf~ and writesf~ - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2049 multichannel support for delay objects - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1978 Some missing multichannel objects
And also, something that's kinda bothering me but not related to this is if we can 'fix' and have a more accurate sqrt~ and cosine table for 0.55 (with a beloved compatibility flag) https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1906
cheers
cheers
Miller
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
while we're at it I also hope we can finally start providing double precision builds from miller's site 'officially' and not as 'beta' tests anymore, huh?
Which brings me to the request, can we try and provide test releases with those builds as well?
thanks
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 13:33, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 04:37, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
Hi, been focusing on docs and manual changes and no objections for that as there'll be time for more revisions on the list.
I don't have any easy/quick request for the test release but I do clearly have a great deal of hopes and expectations for several PRs over there.
And I honestly don't see that many changes yet for the test releases to start popping up and I wonder if you can be clear on some of the things from the lots of other things to do yet.
I'll take the opportunity to reinforce that I hope we can focus on more multichannel features and list PRs again.
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2110 add secondary signal
inlets to clip~
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2059 Add functions to draw
multichannel connections
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2058 allow to change the
number of tables/channels in table DSP objects
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2052 multichannel support
for readsf~ and writesf~
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2049 multichannel support
for delay objects
- https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1978 Some missing
multichannel objects
And also, something that's kinda bothering me but not related to this is if we can 'fix' and have a more accurate sqrt~ and cosine table for 0.55 (with a beloved compatibility flag) https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1906
cheers
cheers
Miller
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Well, I need to get this release out - ther's stuff in there that's way overdue.
I have a not-quite-consistent policy to avoid making multichannel versions of stuff that has state. I think readsf~ and writesf~ should be exceptions to that, but anything else that has state that has to be replicated for multiple channels sounds like trouble to me. OTOH, clip~ has no state -it's a problem for a different reason - I can't come up with a consistent policy about dealing with all the possible cases. But then I don't think it's terribly important since a clip~ can always be replaced by a min~ and max~ pair... so my suggestion would be to use those instead if doing multichannel stuff.
All this is worth continuing to think about.
Meanwhile, I'm not sure I'll ever have the bandwidth to properly test and maintain two different precisions in addition to everything else - I think I have to leave that for others to take on.
cheers
Miller
On 5/6/24 18:40, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
while we're at it I also hope we can finally start providing double precision builds from miller's site 'officially' and not as 'beta' tests anymore, huh?
Which brings me to the request, can we try and provide test releases with those builds as well?
thanks
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 13:33, Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com escreveu:
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 04:37, Miller Puckette <mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu: to pd develope - Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections. Hi, been focusing on docs and manual changes and no objections for that as there'll be time for more revisions on the list. I don't have any easy/quick request for the test release but I do clearly have a great deal of hopes and expectations for several PRs over there. And I honestly don't see that many changes yet for the test releases to start popping up and I wonder if you can be clear on some of the things from the lots of other things to do yet. I'll take the opportunity to reinforce that I hope we can focus on more multichannel features and list PRs again. - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2110 add secondary signal inlets to clip~ - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2059 Add functions to draw multichannel connections - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2058 allow to change the number of tables/channels in table DSP objects - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2052 multichannel support for readsf~ and writesf~ - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2049 multichannel support for delay objects - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1978 Some missing multichannel objects And also, something that's kinda bothering me but not related to this is if we can 'fix' and have a more accurate sqrt~ and cosine table for 0.55 (with a beloved compatibility flag) https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1906 cheers cheers Miller _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 14:01, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
Well, I need to get this release out - ther's stuff in there that's way overdue.
What about the other features and ideas you had in mind for this release, like a message to Pd to toggle between GUI and no-GUI and stuff?
cheers
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 04:37, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
here's a quick last-minute request that improves the release notes for the test release https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2292
cheers
Taking https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2289 of course could also be a good last minute request by the way
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 21:57, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 04:37, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
here's a quick last-minute request that improves the release notes for the test release https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2292
cheers
Em seg., 6 de mai. de 2024 às 22:03, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
Taking https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2289 of course could also be a good last minute request by the way
oops, that'd actually be https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2293 now
On 5/6/24 09:36, Miller Puckette wrote:
to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
today i managed to tackle down a crasher bug reported on raspberry pi.
it turns out that it only appears on arm32 architectures (and when compilers do not initialize values to 0, which they are allowed to do). while there, i build with "-Wuninitialized" and found a few more variables that might get used without being set to any value, which i also fixed.
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2295
sorry for being late, but i think this ought to go in.
gmfasdr IOhannes
Yep, for sure :)
thanks
M
On 5/7/24 11:21, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 5/6/24 09:36, Miller Puckette wrote:
to pd develope -
Of course there are lots of other things to do but... assuming it gets through CI I'm hoping to throw the current master out as 0.55 test1... let me know if there are any last-minute requests or objections.
today i managed to tackle down a crasher bug reported on raspberry pi.
it turns out that it only appears on arm32 architectures (and when compilers do not initialize values to 0, which they are allowed to do). while there, i build with "-Wuninitialized" and found a few more variables that might get used without being set to any value, which i also fixed.
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2295
sorry for being late, but i think this ought to go in.
gmfasdr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev