set message to change the address of the send box is nice but how do you send the message "set 10" to a vsl now. I think it is good to keep the possibility to send set messages to vsl using a send box so the message to change the send should have another name.
--PLu
You could do it like this:
float --> [s volume] -> [r volume] --> [prepend set] --> [vsl]
.hc
On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 06:46 America/New_York, Peter Lunden wrote:
set message to change the address of the send box is nice but how do you send the message "set 10" to a vsl now. I think it is good to keep the possibility to send set messages to vsl using a send box so the message to change the send should have another name.
--PLu
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
I think I have to more specific about the problem. In some of the GUI objects there is built in receivers and senders that you set the name of in its preferences. This mechanism is now partly broken because of the new message implemented in [send]
This is how I like to do it, to be able to build nice user interfaces:
float --> [set $0 ( --> [s directly_to_GUI] [r directly_from_GUI]-> same float
It is nesesery to use a set to avoid loops. This makes it possible to have several syncronized sliders at different places controling the same value using the same message.
--PLu
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
You could do it like this:
float --> [s volume] -> [r volume] --> [prepend set] --> [vsl]
.hc
On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 06:46 America/New_York, Peter Lunden wrote:
set message to change the address of the send box is nice but how do you send the message "set 10" to a vsl now. I think it is good to keep the possibility to send set messages to vsl using a send box so the message to change the send should have another name.
--PLu
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
again a suggestion from my side about this issue:
why not use a message like "setname" to change send's adress (instead of "set") ?
that would cause a lot less trouble ...
oliver
03.04.2003 15:43:14, Peter Lunden plu@tii.se wrote:
I think I have to more specific about the problem. In some of the GUI objects there is built in receivers and senders that you set the name of in its preferences. This mechanism is now partly broken because of the new message implemented in [send]
This is how I like to do it, to be able to build nice user interfaces:
float --> [set $0 ( --> [s directly_to_GUI] [r directly_from_GUI]-> same float
It is nesesery to use a set to avoid loops. This makes it possible to have several syncronized sliders at different places controling the same value using the same message.
--PLu
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
You could do it like this:
float --> [s volume] -> [r volume] --> [prepend set] --> [vsl]
.hc
On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 06:46 America/New_York, Peter Lunden wrote:
set message to change the address of the send box is nice but how do you send the message "set 10" to a vsl now. I think it is good to keep the possibility to send set messages to vsl using a send box so the message to change the send should have another name.
--PLu
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\ http://klingt.org/ground/lift \\\\\\ ///////// http://klingt.org/executive-ensemble ///////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
oliver wrote:
again a suggestion from my side about this issue:
why not use a message like "setname" to change send's adress (instead of "set") ?
and why not use a second inlet that is bound to "" ? that's how i handle inlets that shouldn't be settable via the first inlet. (of course any not so simple to make symbol would do, like "\n\n\t"
mfg.as.rd IOhannes
that would cause a lot less trouble ...
oliver
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
oliver -
Peter Lunden