Patches item #2838176, was opened at 2009-08-15 14:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=2838176...

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: feature Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Tooltips patch for 0.42-5

Initial Comment: This is GG/tim's tooltip patch ported forward to 0.42-5

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-08-15 16:44

Message: Yes, he is very conservative about what he accepts, which is another way to say that he wants to keep the contributors out. Spin it any way you like.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2009-08-15 16:27

Message: It may seem like that, but I don't think its true. He is very conservative about what he accepts. You are free to start your own branch/fork or contribute to others if you don't like Miller's approach.

I could be convinced to include this in Pd-extended if someone was really committed to maintaining it and handling all the issues that arise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-08-15 16:23

Message: Miller's objection about t_class is just an excuse for keeping contributors out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2009-08-15 16:19

Message: Who is this mystery patch fixer? :D I would also very much like to see tooltips in Pd, but Miller had some objections to the original version of this patch which he outlined on the list, IIRC. Was there any attempt to address those objections?

I think Miller's objection was related to modifying the t_class struct, and I think Günter proposed an alternate approach that didn't need to modify that struct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=2838176...