I see you found my question, thanks for your responses. Here is the error I get when DEFDACBLKSIZE is 8 and DEFSENDVS is 64 : error: throw~ out: vector size mismatch
I was getting similar errors when using [s~] [r~] or [catch~].
also, the overhead with a blocksize of 8 is considerably higher than a blocksize of 64, so when using *heavy* Pd-patches you might hit performance problems sooner than later.
Where is the performance hit for DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 ?I see how there could be a performance hit when using a smaller audio driver block size, but would there be much difference between, e.g. DEFDACBLKSIZE = 8 and DEFDACBLKSIZE = 64 if the audio driver block size is set to 64 in both cases?
Thanks,Giulio
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-dev@lists.iem.at Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2016, 8:46 Subject: Re: [PD-dev] DEFDACBLKSIZE and DEFSENDVS
On 2016-07-12 04:51, Giulio Moro via Pd-dev wrote:
My original question was also about why it is defined in multiple places and why DEFSENDVS is defined separately, yet setting them to two different values gives errors.
was it? i don't see this question in your original mail. also: what is the error you get?
fgamsdr IOhannes
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev