Re: [PD-dev] under_scores versus studlyCaps in object names

On Sat Mar 25, 2006 at 09:45:52PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

I just was thinking: C++, Java, SuperCollider, Python, SmallTalk, processing, etc. all use studlyCaps as the standard for object and method names rather than the GNU C under_score_object_names or the Max/Pd-style runeverythingtogether (natural for German and Thai speakers, but not most languages AFAIK).

i think its called camelCase in some circles. no idea why, as i can't read Arabic..

pd symbols can have spaces, so do we even need underscores? i find eather solution incongruous and not idiomatic with pd

Should we make the new Pd libraries use capsAsTheStandardNameFormat? I am beginning to think yes...