On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 22, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
this looks quite promising ... i'd vote for switching from cvs to subversion as soon as possible ...
How about we let it get out of beta before we do the switch?
imo, it's much more comfortable to use than cvs...
It may be in the end, but a lot of us have never used svn, so that means taking the time out to learn it.
Agreed. I don't think that switching to a beta svn right away is going to solve much, and would just divert our attention from more pressing things (whichever they are).
i wouldn't switch to the beta svn, but they're trying to get subversion running "stable" in march ... then i would switch ...
on the other hand i can understand hans, that learning subversion is very difficult which would delay pd's development by several monthes :-) it's a very difficult program to learn, especially when comparing it with something easy like cvs (just kidding) ...
having some experience with both, i don't want to start a flamewar, but i ask the people who are afraid of using a new software to google for cvs and subversion to figure out, what their arguments are and why exactly, they want to stick with subversion. i think no one sticked to win3.11/osx9/kernel-2.0, because he didn't to learn winxp/osx/kernel-2.6
t