B. Bogart wrote:
Does this happen for all receives for abstractions or only ones which also contain the relative pathname?
Will this break old patches that communicate with a subpatch?
[pd array]
[vis 1< | [s pd-array]
no, this will stay untouched.
Now I can't remember if its abstractions or subpatches that require the .pd extension... I guess they should be all consistant.
abstractions require the .pd extension. with the 2nd patch i submitted a ".pd" is appended to the canvas-receiver of an _abstraction_. the "new" (currently: additional, but see the other mails on this topic) canvas-receiver consists of the classname (== relative-pathname + filename). there is no check whether the classname (how you call the object) contains a relative (or even absolute) pathname.
it would be nice if you could just test your patches with a patched version of pd.
fm.asdr IOhannes