On 31/07/2019 09:31, Tsz Kiu Pang wrote:
Alexandre has recently requested a new object/functionality similar to max's [if] … I am just wondering whether my approach (adding a new class to the [expr], [expr~], [fexpr~] mix) is correct, and whether this functionality is something that we need. I will probably put in a pull request soon if there is no objection
Dear TK and Alexandre
I have no objection, but I do have a couple of naïve questions:
[a] In the message case, I am struggling to see the point, as all you need to do is control a [spigot] with the truth value of the test. Or you can assign the false condition a value unused in the true case (if there is any such) and feed the output to [route] or [select]. Or … well doubtless there are many — and likely better — ways to skin this cat. Is it just for convenience, then, or am I missing something?
[b] If a parallel audio case is envisaged, what would it do?
Best
m