On 25 Feb 2006, at 12:38, Tim Blechmann wrote:
imo, subversion is both easier to use and more powerful than cvs ... but converting the current cvs repository to svn is not really trivial ... because of different branch handling ...
I've seen two or three cvs-->svn conversions, and sure, they're not usually a 1-step process, or trivial.
imo, it would be better to set up multiple repositories for the externals, abstractions, and the pd core ... maybe ever multiple repositories for the externals ...
Multiple repos for externals, abs and pd core makes sense, but not for each externals or branch of externals, IMO. I think externals should be a repo on its own.
However, I do agree that there should be some clean up of our externals world before an SVN repo structure for it is made. I know I'm guilty with our own directory in there.
d
-- David Plans Casal Researcher, UEA Studios d.casal at uea dot ac dot uk http://www.davidcasal.com