On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, David Plans Casal wrote:
In any case you guys (main devs, contributors to core) need to sort it out,
it's exactly why I'm putting it on the table. If we just continue to pretend that there is no problem, then the problem will continue to cause harm and something will blow up at the wrong moment (that is, too late).
because what really isn't good is that little people like me, who might help and contribute what they can,
How are you little? Little as in not enough of a programmer? or little as in occasional contributor? If you wish to be more than an occasional contributor, there is a lot that can be done while not being a C programmer. A lot can be done on documentation, promotion, testing, organising, etc.
I've never minded contributing patches to a main release manager as opposed to having totally direct access to source, and at the same time I can see the value of devel branch. Is there really no functional way the two can feed each other without trouble?
There are contributions that many people want and that somehow Miller doesn't want. The number of those contributions is increasing. This causes the divergence. To stop the divergence, either Miller has to follow, or people have to stop coding things that Miller refuses to take. If Miller doesn't follow, then I don't know why I'd even try stopping devel from diverging.
____________________________________________________________________ Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada