On Nov 10, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Why? For example, [list append] will happily append a symbol to a float, so the "list" part doesn't seem so accurate. Why not just [append]?
probably because of [append] already exists?
Tcl has "l" letter prefixes for list operations, but it is not consistent about that convention. Tcl has something like Pd's [list] for string operations, e.g. [string compare $a $b]. A third naming system uses C++-style "::" as a namespace delimiter.
The key question remains: what benefit is there to adding special syntax for list functions? Basically everywhere else, only the first element is ever the selector.
.hc
The libtkwidget.so would be included in the libdir to make it a simple package.
so how do you convince the ldopen to look for the libtkwidget.so in your libdir instead of whatever is configured in /etc/ld.so.conf? i guess, adding your libdir path to /etc/ld.so.conf disqualifies it as "a simple package". i would really be interested in a solution for this.
Use environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams