On Thursday, Mar 18, 2004, at 13:36 America/New_York, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Here's my idea: Separate each package out into its own "debian" directory which will compile only one package: externals/debian externals/cyclone/debian externals/flext/debian externals/footils/debian (aka pd-flext-ext; this might to be renamed pd-footils for this to work)
Puh, I fought hard with Guenther to *not* name the package pd-footils which is how it was called once. ;) I'd see a pd-flext-ext package as a package of externals that depend on flext. This doesn't have to be just my externals, in fact, xsample, pool and such should go there as well. They then could build-depend on pd-flext.
externals/OSCx/debian
What is the reason to not package OSC inside pd-externals? It doesn't depend on anything special, just std-C-headers, not even any of Pd's "private" headers.
I think this is mostly because its easiest to work along the lines of the build system used. Each debian package represents a different build system. It may not be pretty, but it makes building the packages easier. That's why I ended up doing the same thing with the MacOS X installer.
.hc
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev